AI employee architecture / Technical reference
TECHNICAL REFERENCE

The technical system behind an AI employee.

Inspect how work moves through context, procedures, approved capabilities, human decisions, review records, and controlled improvement.

ONE SYSTEM · THREE GUIDED VIEWS

Inspect how the whole system carries the work.

Choose a view, apply an illustrative workflow, and open any node for the business outcome, technical mechanism, and review evidence.

MANUFACTURING

RFQ received to approved estimate draft

A request arrives with drawings and a due date. The AI employee assembles the job history, follows the estimating procedure, checks approved systems, and pauses when an assumption needs an estimator.

ILLUSTRATIVE WALKTHROUGH · NOT A CLIENT RESULT

Run the work

  1. Request arrivesThe shared inbox receives drawings, quantities, and the requested delivery date. The queue assigns an owner and due time.
  2. Relevant job history is assembledCurrent specifications, similar prior jobs, rate cards, and open questions are retrieved with source dates attached.
  3. The estimating procedure runsThe AI employee follows the approved checklist, identifies missing inputs, and prepares the work for specialist review.
  4. Approved systems are queriedRead-only connectors retrieve inventory, supplier, and prior-job data required for the draft.
  5. The estimator reviews the exceptionsA missing finish specification and any pricing assumption are routed to the estimator before the draft can move forward.
  6. The draft returns to the queueThe estimate draft, open assumptions, citations, and approval history are stored with the next action and owner.

Control the work

  • The estimating role receives read access to job history and inventory for this request.
  • Retrieval stays within approved suppliers, rate cards, and prior-job records.
  • Inventory and prior-job lookups run through approved read-only connectors.
  • Pricing assumptions pause with the designated estimator before the draft advances.
  • The system retains the sources, open assumptions, approval, and next owner.
  • An interrupted estimate can resume from the last recorded checkpoint without repeating approved work.

Improve the system

  • Estimator edits and approval outcomes could become signals for a later system review.
  • Repeated missing finish specifications could surface as a recurring intake gap.
  • The system could propose a required-field check for the estimating procedure.
  • An estimating owner would evaluate the proposed check and the examples behind it.
  • An approved check could be released as a named procedure version with a rollback point.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Client inquiry to partner-reviewed response

A new inquiry reaches the shared inbox. The AI employee collects the required facts, applies the intake procedure, drafts from approved precedent, and escalates the relationship decision.

ILLUSTRATIVE WALKTHROUGH · NOT A CLIENT RESULT

Run the work

  1. Inquiry enters the shared queueThe email, attachments, sender, and response deadline become one tracked intake item.
  2. The client briefing is assembledThe AI employee retrieves service criteria, relevant precedent, and any permitted relationship history.
  3. The intake checklist runsRequired details are extracted, missing questions are drafted, and the inquiry is routed to the right practice owner.
  4. Approved records are checkedScoped connectors read the CRM, precedent library, and scheduling system without exposing unrelated records.
  5. The practice owner decidesThe AI employee presents the facts, open risks, and a draft response. The owner approves, edits, or declines.
  6. The response and handoff are recordedThe approved draft, decision basis, and next owner return to the shared queue before anything is sent.

Control the work

  • The intake role receives access to the shared queue and permitted relationship records.
  • The briefing excludes unrelated client matters and records outside the requester's scope.
  • CRM, precedent, and scheduling lookups run through scoped connectors.
  • The relationship decision remains with the designated practice owner.
  • The system retains the approved draft, decision basis, and handoff state.
  • A paused inquiry can resume from its last reviewed state with the same supporting record.

Improve the system

  • Partner edits and routing changes could become signals for a later intake review.
  • Repeated requests for the same missing detail could reveal a checklist gap.
  • The system could propose a new intake question and routing instruction.
  • A practice owner would assess the proposal against representative inquiries.
  • An approved revision could enter service as a monitored checklist version.
REGULATED KNOWLEDGE WORK

Policy question to cited answer

A team member asks how a current obligation applies. The AI employee retrieves the governing sources, resolves the relevant relationships, drafts a cited answer, and routes it for review.

ILLUSTRATIVE WALKTHROUGH · NOT A CLIENT RESULT

Run the work

  1. The question is capturedThe request, business context, jurisdiction, and response deadline enter a controlled work queue.
  2. Governing sources are retrievedCurrent policies, agreements, amendments, and related entities are assembled with citations and effective dates.
  3. The review procedure runsThe AI employee applies the approved issue checklist and separates supported findings from unresolved questions.
  4. Authorized repositories are queriedSearch and knowledge connectors read the approved corpus and return only records within the requester's scope.
  5. A reviewer checks the interpretationThe cited draft and unresolved points go to the designated reviewer before the answer is distributed.
  6. The answer remains traceableThe final answer keeps its citations, review history, and the source versions used at the time.

Control the work

  • The compliance role receives access to the approved corpus for the requester's scope.
  • Retrieval filters limit sources by jurisdiction, effective date, and permitted repository.
  • Search and relationship resolution run inside the approved knowledge environment.
  • Interpretive findings pause with the designated reviewer before distribution.
  • The answer retains citations, source versions, reviewer changes, and approval state.
  • A later review can return to the cited source set and the prior approval checkpoint.

Improve the system

  • Reviewer corrections and citation changes could become signals for a later system review.
  • Repeated source-version conflicts could reveal a retrieval or procedure gap.
  • The system could propose an effective-date check for the review procedure.
  • A policy owner would evaluate the change against approved examples and exceptions.
  • An approved check could be released as a monitored procedure version with rollback history.
THE OPERATING LOOP

Follow one responsibility from request to result.

The architecture stays fixed while the selected workflow changes the example inside each step.

01

Work arrives

Channels + triggers + schedules

The AI employee receives a message, file, system event, or scheduled responsibility through a channel your team already uses.

HOW IT WORKS

Gateways and event adapters turn each request into a tracked responsibility with an owner and due state.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

Request arrives. The shared inbox receives drawings, quantities, and the requested delivery date. The queue assigns an owner and due time.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Authorized sender, trigger, channel, and task owner

OPEN THE DEEP DIVE  >
02

Build the briefing

Context + session and durable memory

Current source material, prior decisions, and live task state are assembled before the model responds or acts.

HOW IT WORKS

Retrieval, session recall, and durable memory assemble only the material required for the responsibility.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

Relevant job history is assembled. Current specifications, similar prior jobs, rate cards, and open questions are retrieved with source dates attached.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Sources included, dates, exclusions, and prior state

OPEN THE DEEP DIVE  >
03

Apply the procedure

Skills + orchestration

Versioned instructions define the steps, checks, handoffs, and specialist roles used to carry the work forward.

HOW IT WORKS

A reusable skill coordinates the approved sequence, checks, and specialist handoffs for the work.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

The estimating procedure runs. The AI employee follows the approved checklist, identifies missing inputs, and prepares the work for specialist review.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Procedure version, assigned role, checks, and next step

OPEN THE DEEP DIVE  >
04

Use approved capabilities

Tools + connectors + delegation

Scoped connectors let the AI employee read or update only the systems and records required for the task.

HOW IT WORKS

A governed capability library exposes approved tools, connectors, and specialist tasks to the procedure.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

Approved systems are queried. Read-only connectors retrieve inventory, supplier, and prior-job data required for the draft.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

System, permission, requested operation, and result

OPEN THE DEEP DIVE  >
05

Reach a decision

Rules + approvals + escalation

Rules define what the AI employee may complete, where it must pause, and who has authority to approve an exception.

HOW IT WORKS

Policy checks compare the work with defined authority and route exceptions to the designated reviewer.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

The estimator reviews the exceptions. A missing finish specification and any pricing assumption are routed to the estimator before the draft can move forward.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Boundary reached, exception raised, approver, and decision

OPEN THE DEEP DIVE  >
06

Return the result

State + trace + checkpoints

Task state, sources, tool calls, approvals, and the final result remain available for review and the next handoff.

HOW IT WORKS

Persistent state and checkpoints retain the result, supporting evidence, current status, and next owner.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

The draft returns to the queue. The estimate draft, open assumptions, citations, and approval history are stored with the next action and owner.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Status, evidence, actions, approvals, and next owner

OPEN THE DEEP DIVE  >
M

Model intelligence

Reasoning engine

The model interprets the assembled briefing and helps produce the next useful step.

HOW IT WORKS

The surrounding system supplies context, instructions, tools, and decision boundaries before requesting reasoning.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

The model reasons over the assembled job briefing and drafts the next estimating step.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Briefing supplied, requested task, model response, and next action

EXPLORE HARNESS ENGINEERING  >
THE CONTROL PLANE

See the boundaries around every action.

Identity, data scope, execution policy, human authority, and recovery remain inspectable across the responsibility.

C1

Scoped identity

Credentials + permissions

Each responsibility operates with a defined identity and the minimum access required for its work.

HOW IT WORKS

Credential stores and role policies scope which systems and operations are available to the AI employee.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

The estimating role receives read access to job history and inventory for this request.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Identity used, permission granted, expiration, and requested operation

EXPLORE SECURITY  >
C2

Data boundaries

Retrieval scope + secret handling

The system limits which records enter the briefing and keeps credentials outside the working context.

HOW IT WORKS

Retrieval filters, tenant boundaries, and secret references constrain data before the model receives it.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

Retrieval stays within approved suppliers, rate cards, and prior-job records.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Repositories searched, filters applied, records excluded, and secret reference

EXPLORE CONTEXT ENGINEERING  >
C3

Controlled action

Isolated execution + tool policies

Approved actions run inside a bounded environment with explicit tool and network policies.

HOW IT WORKS

Execution boundaries separate the task from unrelated systems and restrict the operations a tool can perform.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

Inventory and prior-job lookups run through approved read-only connectors.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Runtime boundary, tool policy, network scope, operation, and result

EXPLORE LOCAL AI  >
05

Reach a decision

Rules + approvals + escalation

Rules define what the AI employee may complete, where it must pause, and who has authority to approve an exception.

HOW IT WORKS

Policy checks compare the work with defined authority and route exceptions to the designated reviewer.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

Pricing assumptions pause with the designated estimator before the draft advances.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Boundary reached, exception raised, approver, and decision

OPEN THE DEEP DIVE  >
06

Return the result

State + trace + checkpoints

Task state, sources, tool calls, approvals, and the final result remain available for review and the next handoff.

HOW IT WORKS

Persistent state and checkpoints retain the result, supporting evidence, current status, and next owner.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

The system retains the sources, open assumptions, approval, and next owner.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Status, evidence, actions, approvals, and next owner

OPEN THE DEEP DIVE  >
C6

Review and recovery

Trace + checkpoints + rollback

A reviewer can see what happened, resume interrupted work, or return to an earlier approved state.

HOW IT WORKS

Traces and checkpoints preserve inputs, decisions, state transitions, and restorable versions.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

An interrupted estimate can resume from the last recorded checkpoint without repeating approved work.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Checkpoint, interruption, prior state, recovery action, and reviewer

READ ABOUT REVIEW RECORDS  >
A GOVERNED LEARNING LOOP

See how review signals could become a safer procedure.

This illustrative view shows a possible path from outcomes to a reviewed, versioned system update.

ILLUSTRATIVE CAPABILITY · NOT A PRODUCTION CLAIM
I1

Observe outcomes

Results + reviewer feedback

Completed work and reviewer changes can reveal where the operating system needs attention.

HOW IT WORKS

Outcome records collect corrections, exceptions, and approval decisions for later analysis.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

Estimator edits and approval outcomes could become signals for a later system review.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Result, reviewer change, exception, and source record

I2

Find a repeatable pattern

Pattern detection + evaluation

Repeated corrections can be separated from one-off preferences before any system change is proposed.

HOW IT WORKS

Evaluation compares similar outcomes and identifies a bounded, evidence-backed opportunity for improvement.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

Repeated missing finish specifications could surface as a recurring intake gap.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Examples reviewed, recurrence, exclusions, and confidence basis

I3

Propose an update

Memory + skill refinement

The system can draft a specific memory or procedure change without activating it.

HOW IT WORKS

A proposed update names the affected memory or skill, its evidence, and the expected behavior change.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

The system could propose a required-field check for the estimating procedure.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Proposed diff, evidence, affected responsibilities, and expected outcome

READ ABOUT MEMORY AND SKILLS  >
I4

Review the change

Human validation + approval

An accountable owner evaluates the proposal, its evidence, and its operating impact.

HOW IT WORKS

The review gate supports approval, revision, rejection, or a limited trial before release.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

An estimating owner would evaluate the proposed check and the examples behind it.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Reviewer, decision, edits, test scope, and approval record

READ ABOUT APPROVALS  >
I5

Version and monitor

Release + observation + rollback

An approved update can enter service as a named version with monitoring and a recovery path.

HOW IT WORKS

Versioned activation records what changed, where it applies, how it performs, and how to reverse it.

IN THIS WALKTHROUGH

An approved check could be released as a named procedure version with a rollback point.

WHAT YOU CAN INSPECT

Version, release scope, observed results, owner, and rollback point

Bring one workflow. We will sketch the system around it.

A 30-minute working session maps the work, required access, human decisions, evidence, and likely architecture.

BOOK A WORKING SESSION